The first way for a historical argument to fail to be convincing is to offer inadequate evidence. In a convincing historical argument, the evidence should be and by additional evidence, there should be enough evidence offered in support of the thesis, and it should include as many relevant items of evidence as possible and seek to employ The second way for a historical argument to fail to be convincing is to use faulty reasoning in connecting the thesis to the cited evidence. In a convincing argument, the logical link between the evidence and the thesis should be . A convincing historical argument will demonstrate that the thesis is the most plausible conclusion to draw from the cited evidence. Considering possible objections to the argument, and responding to those objections with additional explanation or more evidence, usually the argument.