Which of the following is NOT true of Gerrymandering It is unconsitutional because it interferes with the people's right to vote It is unconsitutional because it interferes with the people's right to vote redraws district lines in response to changing populations redraws district lines in response to changing populations Can be used to manipulate votes to favor one political party Can be used to manipulate votes to favor one political party Redistricting on racial or ethnic grounds is unconsitutional Redistricting on racial or ethnic grounds is unconsitutional

Consultant: you're welcome. as a first step, our team analyzed the other potential primary contenders. the reality is that with such a strong field, it is going to be difficult to gain the of votes necessary to avoid a runoff—unless you want to go negative from the start. and our opposition research team found plenty of ammunition to do just that.

You are a financial planner and you are preparing for a meeting with your new client, anne. what would you be most likely to ask anne to bring to the meeting with her? a. pictures of her children b. her parents c. any will d. sales records for her ex-husband's business

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.