The supreme court case worcester v. georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it
a) struck down laws created by the georgia legislature to seize cherokee lands.
b) ruled that the u. s. government’s indian removal act was unconstitutional.
c) established the indian territory east of the mississippi in present-day oklahoma.
d) declared that the u. s. government would honor the cherokee nation’s constitution.

Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.

Further Explanation:  

Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.

Learn more:

1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.

link

2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.

link

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia

Subject: Social Science

Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.

A) struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.

Worcester v. Georgia (1832) was a significant victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia in the antebellum period. In this case, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Georgia statute which prohibited non-natives from being present on Native American land without a license was unconstitutional. It argued that the Cherokee could be understood as another nation, and the United States did not have the right to control the land or possessions of other nations at will. Moreover, the responsibility of dealing with foreign nations was held by the federal government, not by the states. The case built the foundations of tribal sovereignty in the United States.

i believe your answer is true

sorry if wrong

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great