Jim and Kathy have a contract with a term that is not clear. Kathy and Jim both have different—yet reasonable—interpretations of the term. If Kathy wrote the contract, a court will: a. evaluate both interpretations and develop a reasonable interpretation that is somewhere in between. b. accept Jim's interpretation because Kathy wrote the contract. c. accept Kathy's interpretation because she wrote the contract and should know what she meant. d. call in a third party to develop a reasonable interpretation.