PART B: Which TWO excerpts from the story best support the answer to Part A? A. "It was about a week after that that the old man, waking suddenly in the night, stretched out his hand and found himself alone. The room was in darkness, and the sound of subdued weeping came from the window." (Paragraph 98) B. ""Get it,' she panted; 'get it quickly , and wish — Oh, my boy, my boy! / Her husband struck a match and lit the candle. 'Get back to bed,' he said unsteadily. You don't know what you are saying." (Paragraphs 113-114)
C. "Neither spoke, but both lay silently listening to the ticking of the clock. A stair creaked, and a squeaky mouse scurried noisily through the wall." (Paragraph 128)
D."His wife sat up in bed listening. A loud knock resounded through the house. I 'It's Herbert!' she screamed. It's Herbert!'" (Paragraphs 133-134)
E. "But her husband was on his hands and knees groping wildly on the floor in search of the paw. If he could only find it before the thing outside got in." (Paragraph 142)
F. “A cold wind rushed up the staircase, and a long loud wail of disappointment and misery from his wife gave him courage to run down to her side, and then to the gate beyond. The street lamp flickering opposite shone on a quiet and deserted road." (Paragraph 143) ​

A. "It was about a week after that that the old man, waking suddenly in the night, stretched out his hand and found himself alone. The room was in darkness, and the sound of subdued weeping came from the window." (Paragraph 98)

F. “A cold wind rushed up the staircase, and a long loud wail of disappointment and misery from his wife gave him courage to run down to her side, and then to the gate beyond. The street lamp flickering opposite shone on a quiet and deserted road." (Paragraph 143) ​

Explanation:

The above given part of the paragraph are the best excerpts which helps to support the answer to the given part A

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.