Given the following syllogism: No untalented bards are compelling writers, so some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets, for some inspired poets are talented bards. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 1A, the conclusion is: Group of answer choices

Given the following syllogism:

No untalented bards are compelling writers,

So some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets.

For some inspired poets are talented bards

A) After reducing the number of terms in the syllogim, what is the conclusion?

B) Major premise?

C) Minor Premise?

A. All compelling writers are talented bards

B.  Some inspired poets are talented bards

C.  Some inspired poets are not compelling writers

Explanation:

Syllogism is a term in philosophy that describes logical conclusion, derived from deductive reasoning to obtain conclusion on the premises of two or more proposition, which is considered to be true.

Hence, in this case, the conclusion of this syllogism is that, All compelling writers are talented bards

While the major premise, which is supported by two premises is - Some inspired poets are talented bards

The minor premise is - Some inspired poets are not compelling writers

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.