subject
Social Studies, 09.04.2020 01:26 liv5779

The Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeals' decision and restored Alvarado's conviction. The Court said that being "in custody" was a matter of law, not of whether Alvarado believed he was in custody. Even though Alvarado was a minor, he was not in custody by law, so he did not have to be reminded of his Miranda rights.

Which answer best describes the Court’s decision?

The confession cannot be used, because Alvarado believed that he could not leave.
The confession can be used, because Alvarado was not in custody.
The confession can be used, because Alvarado thought that he could leave.
The confession cannot be used, because Alvarado did not know his rights

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
When and why were fingerprints first used in the united states
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Brainliest to who answers! what is the function of a purchasing cooperative, or co-op?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:10
Which of the following statements about the effects of subliminal stimuli is most accurate? subliminal stimuli have no effect on attitudes or behavior. subliminal stimuli can lead people to vote for political candidates they do not support. subliminal exposure to thirst-related words can lead thirsty people to drink more. subliminal stimuli can lead people to violate deeply held values.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:50
The principle of checks and balances is based on the notion that
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeals' decision and restored Alvarado's conviction. The...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 07:10
question
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 07:10