In the case of tinker v. des moines independent community school district (1969), the court ruled that symbolic speech, like wearing armbands as a form of protest, is
a.

protected by the first amendment
b.

not protected by first amendment
c.

protected by the first amendment, except in the case of individuals younger than 21
d.

protected by the second amendment’s protection of the right to bear arms

A. protected by the first amendment

Explanation:

At that time, Tinker coordinated a protest toward government's policy to sent troops to vietnam war by making the members of protest wear armbands that symbolize their disapproval.

Des Moines Independent Community School District brought the case to the court because they believe the activists' action was disrupting the school hour. They argued that first amendment only protected people's vocal speech.

The court disagree and ruled in favour of Tinker. They determined that non-vocal / symbolic speech could also be used in protest that protected under the first amendment.

i believe she will have 25 quarters.

step-by-step explanation:

c. wright mills's sociological imagination suggest investigating to explain this increase?