Casey is a junior in college and is the president of his fraternity. as part of the recruitment process of new members of the fraternity, it has been a tradition to "haze" them even though it is against school policy. casey implements a "no hazing policy" for his fraternity. casey, in the post-conventional level of moral reasoning, would most likely say:

Explanation:

Based on the information provided in regards to the scenario at hand it is most likely that Casey would say that she implemented a "No hazing policy", simply because hazing is wrong and can lead lasting psychological effects on students. Therefore it should not be done, this is why Casey most likely decided to ban hazing.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

50% i think

explanation: