Which scenario best describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent?

C.

Explanation:

The principle of precedent states that judges must inform their decisions based on previous decisions in similar cases. This ensures that judges are not arbitrary and that the law is consistent. Option C is an example of judges going against the principle of precedent because, even though earlier courts had declared the censoring of newspapers unconstitutional, the federal judge is ruling against this previous decision.

a secular government seeks to separate its decisions and policies from religious influences. good luck

explanation:

loess contribute to the flooding of rivers by providing the silt that is washed into rivers and constantly raises the bed of the rivers. this elevation above the surrounding flood plains and dams allow the river to overwhelm the dams and flood thousand of square miles of neighboring flood plains.