Ihave a quation about functions. so i have 2 over -7 times (x+4) ik it becomes 2/-7x but what happens to the 4 does it turn into 8/-7 or what?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

How much dextrose 70% must be mixed with dextrose 5% to prepare 1,000 ml of dextrose 20%?

Use multiples to write two fractions equivalent to 7/9. 14/18, 8/10 6/8, 21/27 10/12, 28/36 14/18, 21/27