subject
Mathematics, 06.11.2021 02:40 pradojosselinep34b1k

Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangle? The triangle is acute because 22 + 52 > 42.
The triangle is acute because 2 + 4 > 5.
The triangle is not acute because 22 + 42 < 52.
The triangle is not acute because 22 < 42 + 52.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:40
Afactory makes propeller drive shafts for ships. a quality assurance engineer at the factory needs to estimate the true mean length of the shafts. she randomly selects four drive shafts made at the factory, measures their lengths, and finds their sample mean to be 1000 mm. the lengths are known to follow a normal distribution whose standard deviation is 2 mm. calculate a 95% confidence interval for the true mean length of the shafts. input your answers for the margin of error, lower bound, and upper bound.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
If there is 20 dogs in the shelter and 5 dogs get homes, and then 43 more dogs come. how many dogs are there in the shelter?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
Suppose that g(x)=f(x+9) which statement best compares the graph of g(x) with the graph of f(x)
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
92ft long and 48 wide resurface 2.75$
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangl...
Questions
question
History, 01.06.2021 17:10
question
Mathematics, 01.06.2021 17:10
question
Mathematics, 01.06.2021 17:10
question
Mathematics, 01.06.2021 17:10