Y= -3x + 1 and y= x - 3

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Two different linear functions are shown below with two points given from each function. use slope-intercept form or point-slope form to find the equation of each. linear function a points: (–5, –2), (–5, 7) linear function b points: (7, –5), (–2, –5) function a has: the equation of line a is: function b has: the equation of line b is:

An ant travels at a constant rate of 30cm every 2 minutes.at what speed does the ant travel per minute