Carlos found the area of the figure check his work and explain any errors

The correct are is 5.5 cm².

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all, Carlos calciulated the are of the rectangle correctly, only the are unit is wrong, it should be 3 cm².

He made a mistake calculating the area of a the triangle: The area of a triangle can be calculated by multiplying the base by the height by .

(Comment if you want a deeper explanation on where this comes from)

He mistakenly takes 4 cm for the height, but if you look carefully the height of the triangle in this case is 4 cm - 1.5 cm = 2.5 cm.

That gives for the area of the triangle.

Adding those two together gets you a total area of 5.5 cm².

Sample Response :   Carlos did not label units; all of his units should be cm2. Carlos incorrectly found the area of the triangle. The height of the triangle is 2.5 cm, and the area is 2.5 cm2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps ; )

the correct answer is b. negative exponential growth.

step-by-step explanation:

you can tell it's an exponential function because it decreases rapidly then levels out and never touches the x-axis.

it is negative because the y-axis decreases as the x-axis increases.

therefore it is a negative exponential growth graph.

hope i !

x = -5

step-by-step explanation: