Management of el burrito decides that if the burritos are larger than the standard weight of 1.2 lb, drink sizes will have to be reduced to compensate for the loss of profits.

for a one-sided hypothesis test where h0: = 1.2 lb, ha: > 1.2 lb, and = .01, which of these statements represents a type ii error for this scenario?

a. the test concludes that the average burrito is 1.2 lb and the company increases drink sizes.

b. the test concludes that the average burrito is greater than 1.2 lb, but the actual average is 1.2 lb. drink sizes are reduced.

c. drink sizes are kept the same because the null hypothesis is not rejected, but the actual weight of burritos is greater than 1.2 lb.

d. the average burrito weighs 1.2 lb, the null hypothesis is not rejected, and drink sizes are kept the same.

e. the test reveals that the average burrito weighs less than 1.2 lb and drink sizes are increased.

C. Drink sizes are kept the same because the null hypothesis is not rejected, but the actual weight of burritos is greater than 1.2 lb.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts

A type II error is defined "as the probability of incorrectly retaining the null hypothesis, when in fact it is not applicable to the entire population"

Solution to the problem

The system of hypothesis are on this case:

H0:

So then the alternative hypothesis, by the complement rule is:

Ha:

Based on this we can conclude that the correct options on this case would be:

C. Drink sizes are kept the same because the null hypothesis is not rejected, but the actual weight of burritos is greater than 1.2 lb.

Is the mist complete option and the reason why is because we are retaining or FAIL to reject the null hypothesis when actually is FALSE.

answer:   segregation violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment, which holds that no state can “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

details/explanation:

brown v. board of education of topeka, decided by the us supreme court in 1954, ruled that all americans are entitled to the same civil liberties and protections in regard to access to education. until that decision, it was legal to segregate schools according to race, so that black students could not attend the same schools as white students.   an older supreme court decision, plessy v. ferguson (1896), had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.   in the case of brown v. board of education, that standard was challenged and defeated.   segregation was shown to create inequality, and the supreme court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.

the ruling was important in advancing civil rights because it affirmed that the 14th amendment applies to all rights and privileges of citizens, including access to   education.   this was being violated by states whose laws supported the segregation of schools.   section 1 of the 14th amendment reads as follows: