Students attending schools with mandatory uniform policies experience less pressure than do students who must choose their wardrobes. this is because school uniforms allow students and their parents to save money and time. the financial investment in uniforms at the beginning of the school year is far more economical than the purchase of an entire wardrobe of designer clothes and trendy styles. students who do not have to deliberate what to wear each morning are able to invest their time in more productive ways, such as studying for tests or finishing homework. uniforms may stifle students’ self-expression, but there are many other ways for them to reveal their individuality at school. which fact best supports the author’s position? on average, school uniforms cost $150 a year, which is much less than the average spent on back-to-school clothes. parents have the right to exempt their children from wearing school uniforms, but they must meet with an administrator to discuss the issue. in 1994, a school district in california implemented a school uniform policy in grades k-8, which affected more than 60,000 students. to assist schools in establishing a uniform policy, the us department of education has created an online manual.

Here Is Your Answer! On average, school uniforms cost $150 a year, which is much less than the average spent on back-to-school clothes.

Option A. The fact that best supports the author's position is the one that states that on average, school uniforms cost $150 a year, which is much less than the average spent on back-to-school clothes.

Explanation:

This argument supports the author's opinion that the financial investment in uniforms that parents have to make at the beginning of the school year, is far less expensive than the budget that parents have to spend in buying ca wardrobe for their kids who do not wear a uniform to school.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

1. seasonal

2. frictional unenployment

3. the number of the labor force multiplied by 100 and then subtract the number of unemployed.

4. 4%

5. an increase in prices