Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why

I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (almost) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.

Hope this helps!

I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P

i think it can have both positive and negative effects on businesses.

for example:

lets say you own a small business and taxes go up 4% that means it is going to cost your business more money to buy product to sell. but at the same time you make more money from the tax rise.

that is my theory.

the numbers are even higher.

explanation:

statistics have shown that more that 60% of test takers fail the first time and have to retake the test.