In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states. b. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. c. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south. d. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.

Which action bestillustrates the process of making an interpretation? a. a historian reads a secondary source about the cold war to find out the dates and locations of important historical occurrences. important historical occurrences, b. a historian publishes a popular article about racism in 20th- century south africa but does not cite any sources. c. a historian writes a textbook designed to teach college students about the duties of a professional historian. d. a historian reads speeches by english and french leaders during world war il to differentiate between their content and tone.

Describe the events that preceded and led to the partition of india. what were the effects of partition on india and pakistan?

Which of these was not a part of the english bill of rights? people could bear arms. monarchs could create taxes. monarchs could not suspend laws. free speech was ok in parliament.