subject
History, 09.11.2019 03:31 emthebest123

Which statement provides evidence that president truman supported u. s. intervention into the affairs of european nations who were fighting against the expansion of communism? from harry truman's address to congress march 12, 1947 [i am fully aware of the broad implications involved if the united states extends assistance to greece and turkey, and i shall discuss these implications with you at this time.] one of the primary objectives of the foreign policy of the united states is the creation of conditions in which we and other nations will be able to work out a way of life free from coercion. this was a fundamental issue in the war with germany and japan. our victory was won over countries who sought to impose their will, and their way of life, upon other nations. to ensure the peaceful development of nations, free from coercion, the united states has taken a leading part in establishing the united nations. [the united nations is designed to make possible lasting freedom and independence for all its members.] we shall not realize our objectives, however, unless we are willing to free people to maintain their free institutions and their national integrity against aggressive movements that seek to impose upon them totalitarian regimes. this is no more than a frank recognition that totalitarian regimes imposed on free peoples, by direct or indirect aggression, undermine the foundations of international peace and hence the security of the united states. [the peoples of a number of countries of the world have recently had totalitarian regimes forced upon them against their will.] the government of the united states has made frequent protests against coercion and intimidation, in violation of the yalta agreement, in poland, rumania, and bulgaria. i must also state that in a number of other countries there have been similar developments. [at the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. the choice is too often not a free one.] one way of life is based upon the will of the majority, and is distinguished by free institutions, representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty, freedom of speech and religion, and freedom from political oppression. the second way of life is based upon the will of a minority forcibly imposed upon the majority. it relies upon terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio; fixed elections, and the suppression of personal freedoms. [i believe that it must be the policy of the united states to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.] it would be an unspeakable tragedy if these countries, which have struggled so long against overwhelming odds, should lose that victory for which they sacrificed so much. collapse of free institutions and loss of independence would be disastrous not only for them but for the world. discouragement and possibly failure would quickly be the lot of neighboring peoples striving to maintain their freedom and independence.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
What did the japanese regard as the main purpose of the attack
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
The clergy comprised the wealthy first estate with members of noble descent in particular having a great deal of power.what was the source of the clergy’s wealth
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Jefferson davis was the president of the united states of america during the civil war. true or false?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
What was the respond by the federal government to the activists of the kkk
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement provides evidence that president truman supported u. s. intervention into the affair...
Questions
question
Biology, 15.12.2020 01:30
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:30
question
Mathematics, 15.12.2020 01:30