FEDERALISTS / ANTI-FEDERALISTS PLEASE HELP 1) Provide a strong summary of the argument on Federalist and Anti-Federalist stances on the modern-day American government. Briefly state, for each branch of government, whether the Federalists and Anti-Federalists of early America would support its current power and capabilities.

2) How have the powers of the Executive Branch changed since the writing of the Constitution? What was the stance of both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists at that time? What would the position of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the modern-day Executive Branch be? Please reference at least three specific amendments, legal cases, or precedents to support it.

3) How have the powers of the Legislative and Judicial Branches
changed since the writing of the Constitution? What was the stance of both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists at that time? What would the Federalists and Anti-Federalists position be regarding the modern-day Legislative and Judicial Branches?Please reference at least three specific amendments, legal

cases, or precedents to support it.

legislative branch:

one of the three branches of government divided between the senate and the house of representatives.

- creates or makes laws

- power to override a veto

executive branch:

one of the three branches of government, headed by the president.

- enforces or carries out laws

- power to veto a bill sent to it by congress

judicial branch:

one of the three branches of government, headed by the chief justice of the supreme court.

- interprets laws

- power to declare laws or actions by the government unconstitutional

definitely a for sure. ill see and update if i get the answer

from the religious point of view, the conflicts began because of the enmity between catholic and protestants. in 1649, at the insistence of baltimore, the colonial assembly approved the act of religious tolerance, the first law in the colonies granting freedom of worship, though only for christians. in 1654, however, with the protestants of maryland in the majority, the act was revoked. the almost civil war broke out and order was not restored until 1658, when lord baltimore was returned to power.

on the issue of class conflict, the chesapeake region offered few economic opportunities to contract employees who had served their term of obligation. even with the small amount of capital needed to grow tobacco, former hired servants at best became subsistence farmers, a mature class for those called to rebellion, such as those proposed by nathaniel bacon. as the number of new hired workers declined because of limited chances of progress and reports of severe treatment, they were replaced by african slaves.

from the racial point of view, after 1660, the chesapeake colonies imposed laws that defined slavery as a lifelong and hereditary condition based on race. this made slaves profitable because planters could rely not only on their work but also on their children. the slave population, which numbered four thousand in virginia and maryland in 1675, grew significantly by the end of the century.

1775 is your answer hope this