Instructions After your group discussion, respond independently to the following reflection questions. 1. What did you learn from this conversation? 2. What did you contribute? 3. How did you prepare for this discussion? 4. What ground rules did you and the other participants establish? How did they work? 5. What is an example of a time during the discussion when you challenged or built on an idea shared by someone else? 6. Did you disagree with a point raised during the discussion? How did you respond to it? 7. How well did you and the other discussion participants support your ideas with evidence? 8. How have your ideas about this topic changed as a result of this conversation?

c

the articles of confederation placed most of the power on the feds

the punishment for breaking the law would depend on the conditions or the seriousness of the law being broken, if he or she breaks the law while doing some great discovery or invention then it would classify as a scientific fraud. there are other words to describe the crime but scientific fraud would be the harshest one.

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".