Which statement best describes the reliability of this
source?
o its content is mostly reliable because it accurately
describes how the war began.
o its content is mostly reliable because it describes
the true cost of the war.
its reliability is questionable because it supports the
us and south korean account
its content is unreliable because it opposes the us
policy of containment.

Hin t in the section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? he section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? ow does the writer's point of view in "the completely free market" affect the credibility of the article? a. it's written in the third person, which allows the author to examine all sides of the debate. b. since it's written in the first person, it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument. c. since it's written in the second person, it puts the reader in the writer's position, and gives the reader more to consider from this perspective. d. it's written in the first person, but is conducted as an interview with several different sources, providing a full-circle debate.

Describe the geography of the nile valley . how did this geography affect civilizations that emerged in the nile valley

Compose a three-paragraph essay that puts forth an argument about the impact of population growth on the united states. as you write, be sure to include the following sections: an introduction that includes a topic sentence or paragraph that incorporates your argument a clearly stated argument that you will defend at least seven specific facts from the information you analyzed or found in your research for this activity an appropriately formal tone transitions good grammar and proper spelling references to your research in your writing, including direct quotes and appropriate citations a concluding statement or paragraph that incorporates your argument