Which civil liberty was established through the supreme courts miranda v. arizona decision? a. the right to a reasonable expectation of privacy b. the right to freely practice one's religon in public places c. the right to an attorney after being accused of a crime d. the right to remain silent after being arrested by police

Option C

Explanation:

The right to an attorney after being accused of the crime was the civil liberty established through the supreme courts Miranda vs Arizona decision. The supreme court versus Miranda was a 1966 case in which the supreme court ruled that police will have to inform the detained criminal or  the  suspect about their constitutional right to an attorney and self incrimination. The case began when police arrested Ernesto Miranda and charged him with kidnapping and robbery. He first appealed to the Arizona court and later to the supreme court. The supreme court referred to the fifth and sixth constitutional Amendments and ruled that Criminal suspects have the right to refuse to be a witness against himself and also that criminal defendants have the right to an attorney.

salmon were fished in puget sound.

when we think of a­ncient paga­n kings, the ideas of justice and fairness probably aren't the first things to come to mind. we moderns may be more likely to imagine fickle, power-hungry despots who were ready to put someone to death on a whim. but king hammurabi, who ruled a prosperous and thriving babyloniaalmost four millennia ago, doesn't quite fit that mold. he claimed to have protect the weak from oppression, and scholars believe he fostered an atmosphere of justice and righteousness for his people.

this belief is based on an object that was discovered only a century ago. it has already earned a place alongside the rosetta stone as one of the most important artifacts of the ancient world. this stela (stone pillar) bears the inscription of the code of hammurabi, and it has shed light on the laws, culture and life in babylonia.

read more on -