How did British policy in India fulfill the economic argument for establishing colonies? Provide two examples. WILL REPORT IF JUST ANSWERED FOR POINTS

British policies in India were economically profitable at the expense of the Indians.

Explanation:

The colonial policies were justified by the enormous economic potential of the colonies where in

the cost incurred of production was to be extracted from the colony by itself and then the profits of the enterprise was taken away by the colonizer to their native country.

Thus, the policies implemented in India made the colony deplete of resources and filled the pockets of the colonizer which was the primary goal of colonialism.

- sorry if this is wrong i only put what i know..

1. international: struggle for hegemony and empire outstrips the fiscal resources of the state

2. political conflict: conflict between the monarchy and the nobility over the “reform” of the tax system led to paralysis and bankruptcy.

3. the enlightenment: impulse for reform intensifies political conflicts; reinforces traditional aristocratic constitutionalism, one variant of which was laid out in montequieu’s spirit of the laws; introduces new notions of good government, the most radical being popular sovereignty, as in rousseau’s social contract [1762]; the attack on the regime and privileged class by the literary underground of “grub street; ” the broadening influence of public opinion.

4. social antagonisms between two rising groups: the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie

5. ineffective ruler: louis xvi

6. economic hardship, especially the agrarian crisis of 1788-89 generates popular discontent and disorders caused by food shortages.

the answer is b.2008 and 2012 were presidential election years.