Two historians are most likely to reach different interpretations about a historical event because

It could be based on how those historians learned the subject. Textbooks though we trust can easily have false information. So, for example a Northern textbook could say that millions of slaves were brought to the U.S. while a Southern textbook could say they brought millions of "workers"

Explanation:

Als based on what the historical event is like if it can be interpreted differently it could be basically because everyone has different opinions. So one might see something as an insult while the other might see at a joke.

question 1: a) thurgood marshall

question 2: b) the civil rights act of 1964

question 3: c) brown v board of education

question 4: d) creation of the dept of education

question 5: a) welfare and social security

explanation: