How did the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case lead to the decision of Southern states, including South Carolina, to secede? It was decided that slaves were citizens and had constitutional rights. This caused panic in the South and led to the immediate secession of Southern states. While the South was pleased that the decision affirmed slaves as " property" they feared that, once electedLincoln would reverse the decision and decided to secede. The court decided that Dred Scott was in fact free since he had lived in free territory , upsetting southern slave owners. The South immediately seceded. It created a new line across the country that designated a large free territory to the north and a small slave territory to the south. The South responded with secession.

While the South was pleased that the decision affirmed slaves as "property" they feared that, once elected Lincoln would reverse the decision and decided to secede.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott Decision was unwelcomed by abolitionists, who feared it would be a precedent to the spread of slavery. Therefore, the Republican party recovered the determination to grow political power.

The tension between North and South grew, and many southern states decided to secede from the Union to create the Confederate States of America. When Lincoln was elected as President of the United States, South Carolina immediately seceded.

china is shifting toward specialization in industry and services and away from agriculture.

explanation:

mark brainliest

explanation:

i think it is in quadrant 4.

the five year plans were part of a command economy. there was little choice in what would be emphasized for the current 5 year period.

the answer to democracy or totalitarianism is a bit harder. in stalin's time, russia was totalitarian. now that's not entirely true. putin has moved towards at least the boundary.