How did the case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment? It allows people to waive their right to Fifth Amendment protection.
It extended the protection to legal actions outside the courtroom.
It ensured that suspects always have an attorney if they want one.
It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

Explanation:

The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case brought to limelight the laxity of policemen in reminding arrested suspects of their rights of self incriminating as failure to inform them would render any confession made invalid in court. Miranda was not informed of his Constitutional rights before interrogation by the police.

The case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment because it requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric