subject
History, 24.08.2019 19:30 allieballey0727

The supreme court ruled in gideon v. wainwright (1963) that gideon had been denied his rights because he
a. had hired an expensive lawyer he could not afford.
b. represented himself in court.
c. paid bail he could not afford.
d. been questioned without having his miranda warning read.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What clause of the treaty of versailles in particular left the germans feeling like they were “stabbed in the back? ” by the victors?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:20
What did this mean for dred scott? a.scott was not a citizen of the united states. b.scott was the property of the federal government. c.scott had no right to sue for his freedom in court. d.scott was considered the property of the slaveholding family.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
What are some of the difficulties that the japanese face due to the islands' geography?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What does the fall of the bastille represent? ?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The supreme court ruled in gideon v. wainwright (1963) that gideon had been denied his rights becaus...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 04:57
question
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 04:57