subject
History, 30.07.2020 18:01 willveloz4

Further rules on campaign finance were scrutinized by the Court when it determined McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, …. The case centered on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, a federal law that imposed new restrictions on campaign financing. The Supreme Court upheld provisions which barred the raising of soft money by national parties and the use of soft money by private organizations to fund certain advertisements related to elections. However, the Court struck down the "choice of expenditure" rule, which required that parties could either make coordinated expenditures for all its candidates, or permit candidates to spend independently, but not both, which they agreed "placed an unconstitutional burden on the parties' right to make unlimited independent expenditures." Which aspect of the election process is being discussed in the passage?

The continued need for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws
The ongoing debate over the role of money in political speech
The expansion of rights being given to minors
The rights of political organizations being infringed upon by individuals

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Brainliesttt !me : ) what was the result of indian independence?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Brainliestttme : ) describe the event: increase in islamic extremism in the middle east
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
The original term of was descriptive of lower-class people who performed manual labor.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
Plz . explain what shopping was like in london during the early 1900s. how does this differ from the modern shopping experience?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Further rules on campaign finance were scrutinized by the Court when it determined McConnell v. Fede...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.04.2020 21:05