Contrasting In what ways does Göring’s speech differ from Churchill’s?

The way Goring's speech differs from Churchill's one is that Gorings spoke to motivate the germans to fight for their identity as "nationalists" by attacking what was against nationalism, even if it was against humanity or some other idea. While Churchill's speech invited the people to fight with everything in the last chance humanity had to be saved.

Explanation:

How Goring's speech differs from Churchill's is because, in the first place, Goring speech was given from a very aggressive way talking about what was nationalism and what was not. And what the expected behavior of a nationalist should be, in other words, it qualified and disqualified the listeners to force them to do what a nationalist should have done, or they would face the consequences of not being a nationalist. It also claimed that they were not criminals or responsible for the atrocities of the first world war, but that they were victors and that years had passed so that image was no longer valid.

Instead, Winston Churchill invited the listeners to do their part in the only chance humanity had to be saved and not fall into the dominion of Hitler, that would destroy humanity as it was once known.

google it and it will pop up

the western roman empire flourished, but the eastern portion of the empire struggled.