How did the case united states v. e. c. knight weaken the sherman antitrust act? the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it existed only in one state. the supreme court ruled that the american sugar company was a legal monopoly since it operated in several states. the supreme court ruled in favor of the american sugar company since it controlled only fifty percent of the sugar-refining factories. the supreme court ruled against the american sugar company since it controlled ninety-eight percent of the sugar-refining factories.

Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865

According to this contract, when will the sharecropper receive his payment?

Which statement explains why eli’s wiesel most likely wrote all rivers run to sea as a memoir?