1. choose the correct verb form for the following sentence. who those loud teenagers in the waiting room? a. is b. am c. are d. be 2. choose the correct verb form for the following sentence: craig and one of his colleagues together on fridays after work. a. run b. runs c. was riding d. rides 3.choose the option that supplies the correct verb and the correct explanation for the verb in the following sentence: at mcnally's burger shop, either the chef or the dishwasher the kitchen floor at the end of every night. a. mop: a compound subject always requires the plural form of the verb. b. mops: when a compound subject is joined by “or” or “nor,” the verb should agree with the subject listed first (chef), which is singular. c. mop: whenever two subjects are joined by “or” or “nor,” the combined subject becomes plural and requires the plural form of the verb. d. mops: when a compound subject is joined by “or” or “nor,” the verb should agree with the subject closest to it (dishwasher), which is singular. 4. choose the option that supplies the correct verb and the correct explanation for the verb in the following sentence: unfortunately, there enough peaches in the refrigerator to bake a pie. a. are not: when there are at least two nouns in the same sentence, the verb should be in a plural form. b. is not: when the adjective “enough” is used to modify a plural subject (peaches), the subject requires a verb in a singular form. c. is not: when the final noun in a sentence (pie) is singular, the verb should be in a singular form. d. are not: when the subject of the sentence (peaches) is plural, the verb should be in a plural form.

1. C. are

2. D. rides

3. D. mops

4. B. is not

Explanation:

1. C. Are because the subject in the question is 'those loud teenagers" which is plural.

2. D. The sentence might contain two subjects but the verb will take the form of the subject closest to it (one of his colleagues).

3. D. Mops: because whenever two subjects are joined by "or" or "nor", the verb should agree with the subject closest to it (dishwasher), which is singular.

4. B. is not: When the adjective "enough" is used to modify a plural subject (peaches), the subject requires a verb in a singular form.

i can you with this question.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this