Xcerpt from: h. vondermoot strikes again with cryptic inducement mary mccormick cryptic inducement is the newest selection in evasion, the ongoing horror fiction series by h. vondermoot. the latest novel finds recurring character simon grant in a castle in barcelona, spain. he awakes on an overcast morning with no memory of who he is or how he arrived in this spine-chilling situation. for the first thirty pages of the story, readers follow simon through a maze of confusion. this is made all the more interesting by the fact that regular readers of the evasion series know more about simon grant than he knows about himself. confusing? yes. intriguing? absolutely. which research source would provide the most bias-free information about h. vondermoot’s life? a) a newsletter from a horror fiction club reactivate b) a brochure from h. vondermoot’s fan club reactivate c) a selection from a biographical dictionary d) a page from h. vondermoot’s publisher’s web site

In which part of this excerpt from the gettysburg address does president abraham lincoln argue that the outcome of the war will depend on the determination and loyalty of northern citizens? four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. we are met on a great battle-field of that war. we have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. it is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. but, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow— this ground. the brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. the world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. it is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. it is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us— that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under god, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Ineed it now in this discussion you will use what you learned about the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias" to compare how both dickinson and shelley used form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems. let's check out one of your classmate's posts: in both "will there really be a 'morning'? " and "i dwell in possibility," emily dickinson capitalizes the words in the poem that tell the reader what to focus on in the poem. shelley also capitalizes words that are not names. these must be important to the meaning of the poem. create one post that compares how both dickinson and shelley use form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias".

What is the tone of the underlined sentence,"george was in no rush apparently