According to the video clips, chomsky suggests that even young children are able to inaccording to the video clips, chomsky suggests that even young children are able to invert interpretations. how does this support his view that language acquisition is more heavily steeped in a nature perspective?

The main reason why this support Chomsky’s view that language acquisition is more heavily steeped in a nature perspective is due to the demonstration that at a young age, children can invert interpretations of heard speech without essentially having heard evidence that validates these interpretations (this is one form of surviving mechanism). 

The primary motivation behind why this help Chomskys view that language obtaining is all the more intensely saturated with a nature viewpoint.

This  is because of the show that at a youthful age, youngsters can rearrange understandings of heard discourse without basically having heard proof that approves these translations this is one type of enduring instrument.

Chomsky put together his hypothesis with respect to the possibility that all dialects contain comparative constructions and rules a widespread sentence structure, and the way that kids wherever secure language the same way, and absent a lot of exertion, appears to demonstrate that we're conceived set up with the fundamentals currently present in our minds.

Chomsky is most popular for his effect on semantics, explicitly, the advancement of groundbreaking language. Chomsky accepted that proper punctuation was straightforwardly answerable for an individual's capacity to comprehend and decipher simple expressions.

For more informtion, refer the following link:

link

its duck

me jerry

explanation: