I'm honestly not sure if this fits in this subject (concerning debating), but here goes: When debating, if the other team has an argument or rebuttal that you or a teammate will address in their written speech later, is it in your best interests to rebut now or wait until your/your teammate's argument?

If rebutting now, should you/your teammate still state your/their argument later or have it cut out completely?

If waiting until your/your teammate's argument later on, should you say something like "I/My teammate will address this in their speech" even if that topic isn't brought up a lot later on in the debate?

Both ways might make you lose points on Matter... is there a better way?

misty passage from the question

all: 19,619

monthly: 467.14

step-by-step explanation:

i have no idea buudy for the points tho

at nineteen years old, nicole c. kear's biggest concern is choosing a major--until she walks into a doctor's office in midtown manhattan and gets a life-changing diagnosis. she is going blind, courtesy of an eye disease called retinitis pigmentosa, and has only a decade or so before lights out. instead of making preparations as the doctor suggests, kear decides to carpe diem and make the most of the vision she has left. she joins circus school, tears through boyfriends, travels the world, and through all these hi-jinks, she keeps her vision loss a secret.

when kear becomes a mother, just a few years shy of her vision's expiration date, she amends her carpe diem strategy, giving up recklessness in order to relish every moment with her kids. her secret, though, is harder to surrender - and as her vision deteriorates, harder to keep hidden. as her world grows blurred, one thing becomes clear: no matter how hard she fights, she won't win the battle against blindness. but if she comes clean with her secret, and comes to terms with the loss, she can still win her happy ending

googles summry you can summarize this in your own words