subject
English, 25.04.2021 04:30 MyaaaMoney

I'm honestly not sure if this fits in this subject (concerning debating), but here goes: When debating, if the other team has an argument or rebuttal that you or a teammate will address in their written speech later, is it in your best interests to rebut now or wait until your/your teammate's argument?

If rebutting now, should you/your teammate still state your/their argument later or have it cut out completely?

If waiting until your/your teammate's argument later on, should you say something like "I/My teammate will address this in their speech" even if that topic isn't brought up a lot later on in the debate?

Both ways might make you lose points on Matter... is there a better way?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
It is important to learn about finances. take, for instance, the old rule of saving ten percent of every paycheck. are most people aware that theyshould immediately take that percentage out of their paycheck and put it into savings? balancing your checkbook is another important element ofkeeping track of your money. buy a money tracking program and use it to manage your money. another important tip is to speak with a financialplanner and learn about stocks and bonds. come up with a savings plan that includes a 401k, stocks, and bonds. and start young. the longer youwait to save, the less compound interest you will accumulate.which is the best title for this paragraph?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:00
What is the climax of chapter 2 of the the sound and the fury? a. the compsons sell their plot of land to send quentin to harvard. b. quentin drops out of school. c. quentin commits suicide. d. caddy gets pregnant.
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
What information can you find in the interview that you cannot find in the informational piece?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:40
Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
I'm honestly not sure if this fits in this subject (concerning debating), but here goes: When deba...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 05:50
question
Biology, 28.04.2021 05:50
question
English, 28.04.2021 05:50