Anita analyzed an editorial in her local newspaper in which the writer argued that a local family-owned business placed profit above employee safety. She concluded that the writer had based the argument on feelings rather than facts. Which of the following sentences from the editorial provides evidence to support Anita’s conclusion?

A “Wepper’s factory is an unsafe working environment.”

B “I know because I worked there until 2014, when my section was shut down.”

C “While I worked at Wepper’s, I never saw the equipment being tested or even repaired.”

D “A co-worker was injured on the job when another worker dropped a wrench on his foot.”

She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.