How would you respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception?

The argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception is explained below in details.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court has ordered some exceptions to the 1st Amendment "distinct and nearly limited." They involve vulgarity, vilification, fraud, provocation, true warnings, speech integral to already unlawful conduct obscenity, cheating, speech that outrages intelligent estate law, true threats, and business.

c) eager anticipation.

i think the answer is c. there are many strengths

i hope this and if its correct mark me brainliest