Can a graphic novel do justice to a work of classic literature, such as The Odyssey? Do you support or reject the idea of using graphic novels to teach classic literature? Support your claim with evidence from this graphic novel and, if relevant, similar graphic novel titles you have read. Address specific characteristics of graphic novels and how these suit or do not suit classic literature.

I think that graphic novels are one of the best ways to teach classic literature. It helps you understand the text and visualize it. On the first page of the graphic novel we read today, the men were clearly exhausted, and if you are not able to recognize the "language" of classic literature, you would not know that while reading the real book. Additionally, the description is shorter since the message is illustrated. I could see the tree branch break off in the graphic novel rather than reading a complex paragraph about it. However, you do not really get to hear the speaker's voice sometimes in graphic novels since it is broken down. Although it was not a graphic novel, in the 6th grade we had to do a play about Thor and it really helped us understand it. When possible, visuals and getting to the point are necessary to comprehend and enjoy a story.

Explanation:

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )

idk

explanation: