Please paraphrase parts a, b, and c thoroughly without losing its meaning. a) Both the Regents of the University of California v. Bakkecase and the Brown v. Board of Educationcase surround the Constitutional Provision of the Equal Protection Clause. This clause states that the law is universal to every person, regardless of race, gender, status, etc., and the government shall protect them equally.

b) The decision in Brown v. Board of Education determined that ‘separate but equal’ is an unconstitutional concept and “inherently unequal.” The decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) states that Bakke was discriminated against, and therefore, should be admitted to the California medical school. The court was able to make gains for racial minorities, as well as limiting white oppression. The two are similar, in that in each case the subject was ruled as discriminated against and took strides to limit segregation and discrimination.

c) Those who disagree with the holding may elect different representatives who will fight on their behalf, along with their ideals. Congress can pass laws in response, but the president has the ability to veto, in order to limit case impacts.