[Men and Women use different scales to weight moral dilemmas ] 1. PART A: Which of the following best summarizes a
central idea of the article?
A It is impossible to know for sure how people will
react to certain moral dilemmas.
B Women are less equipped than men to make big,
hypothetical decisions.
C Women differ from men in their approaches to
making moral decisions.
D Women will usually choose the more drastic
option to prevent people from being hurt.

B. Women are less equipped than men to make big, hypothetical decisions.

Explanation:

Moral dilemmas are conditions of making decisions considering two or more moral values which would violate at least one important moral concern. They are agent's obligation conflict of which a decision has to be made between two inconvenient options.

Considering gender as regards moral dilemmas, men has the capacity to make some hypothetical decisions when under some level of constraints. He tends to make decisions by underrating some factors so as to justify his actions. Thus, both genders use different manner of approach to weigh moral dilemmas. A desicion may be convenient for a man to make, while a woman may consider some drastic options to salvage the situation.

jungkook (if i had to pick one) but all of them rly!

explanation:

um why

hello!

your answer is a. ethical, emotional, and rational.

in order for someone to believe what you say it has to be ethical (morally correct). it should appeal to their emotions, and it must be rationally approving.

also, the other answer is incorrect.

hope this !

mark me brainliest!

have a great day!

~courtney