subject
English, 16.04.2020 17:51 johajackson2014

Read the excerpt from “Tools of the Spymaster."

Both the British and the Americans frequently used horseback riders to carry messages, and both sides tried to capture the riders and get the messages. The rider who lost one of Washington's important messages was Tallmadge himself. It happened when Tallmadge and some of his men were attacked by British troops near the Connecticut–New York border. Tallmadge escaped unharmed but lost a saddlebag full of secret papers.

Luckily, Tallmadge's code did not fall into British hands. But among the papers was a letter from Washington in which he carelessly gave the name and address of an agent, George Higday, saying that he was a man who would probably "convey intelligence to me." Higday was arrested, but he had managed to destroy all evidence of spying. That move probably saved him from hanging.

Which statement best expresses the central idea of the excerpt?

Good spies know to destroy evidence in case they are arrested.

George Higday could have been hanged for spying.

Losing secret papers to the enemy could have serious consequences.

George Washington was not good at writing letters in code.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:10
What is emerson's argument? nature contains faith and reason. nature reflects disgrace and calamity. nature can repair all things.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:20
Simple movements prove to be very significant and saves the rest of the day of the poet from being wasted. explain on the basis of the poem dust of snow class 10 dust of snow english
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which statement correctly analyzes how the passages work together to create a central idea?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from “Tools of the Spymaster."

Both the British and the Americans freque...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 20:50