Read this excerpt from "the selling of joseph" that offers a justification for slavery and answer the question.

obj.1 these blackamores are of the posterity of cham, and therefore are under the curse

gen.9.25,26,7

which statement does not refute the claim made by this reasoning?

few know the conditions of this curse of cham or canaan

canaan actually received the curse instead of cham.

blackgrores are descendents of cush who settled in ethiopia,

blackamores spread to many countries throughout africa

it makes the person recieving the message not feel comfortable with the banana

to kill a mockingbird basically is about a lawyer who goes against everything in a racist society like at the time of this novel, to defend a black man accused of sexual abuse. in the bible there are cases like that of joseph, who was accused by the woman of potifar, for a crime similar to that of tim robbinson, of that novel (genesis 39: 1-20). at this point we see that god also provides the escape to joseph, who was accused unjustly, but in his time, and through his attitude, his faith was not shaken, and god provided the solution. the perspective of god also written in the bible and not pay evil with evil. (ephesians 4: 32, 1 thessalonians 5: 15, 1 peter 3: 9). atticus, the lawyer, demonstrated during this lee novel, empathy, love of neighbor, understood the situation of this accused man. he went against everything in that society, and stood in favor of that man, for the injustice committed. this shows the empathy, the love taught by christ, in some passages that speak of love and justice in the sermon of the beatitudes (especially verses 6 and 7 of matthew 5).

i think the answer is a.

hope it