In the story, they have gone without water for over 16 hours. consider the references to the temperature of their environment. create a hypothesis about whether or not you believe their experience is possible or not. then, using credible sources, such as .gov or .edu, try to prove your hypothesis. use at least two different sources and write a minimum of 2 paragraphs exploring what you found. remember, it is okay to have your hypothesis be incorrect! it is more important that you discover the truth than prove yourself correct.

b

explanation:

answer: producers

explanation:

they are producers because the use photosynthesis to collect sunlight and make food for themselves which when a animal comes around and eats it it becomes a food chain

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.