subject
English, 07.11.2019 17:31 jaimon1016

Laura's paper argues that driver's education in schools
wastes public money. during peer evaluation, her friend
offers a counterclaim that driver's education is valuable for
students who need to drive to jobs.
is this counterclaim appropriate? why or why not?

a. no, because it is not defensible

b. no, because it is neither defensible nor arguable.

c. yes, it is both defensible and arguable.

d. no, because it is not arguable.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:30
From the glass menagerie: "suspended in the mist over berchtesgaden, caught in the folds of chamberlain's umbrella." who was chamberlain? a.paul chamberlain: tom's father b.neville chamberlain: prime minister of great britain. c.pedro chamberlain: amanda's drunkard husband d.cornelius chamberlain: gentleman caller for laura
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
What is the correct definition of a canal? a) a machine that picks cotton faster b) a large entity that can carry heavy loads c) a man made ditch filled with water d) a boat that can travel up the current
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 13:20
What was henry david thoreau's book walden about
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
What source is village life in america
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Laura's paper argues that driver's education in schools
wastes public money. during peer evalu...
Questions