At first i just tried to stay out of mitchell's way, but that didn't solve the problem. so i went to my sister, cassie, about mitchell. now, my sister was a beautiful girl and i knew even mitchell had eyes for her. but cassie was not only beautiful, she was tough, smart, and just a bit cocky. she was six years older than i was and pretty much like a mother hen when it came to me; i knew she'd take my part. "cassie, you know 'bout mitchell? " i asked her.

why does paul decide to talk to cassie about mitchell?

he knows that she will support him and give him good advice.
he knows that she will teach him how to win a fist fight.
he wants her to beat mitchell up for mistreating him.
he wants her to speak to mitchell about his bad behavior.

He knows that she will support him and give him good advice.

Option A. Paul decides to talk to Cassie about Michael because he knows that she will support him and give him good advice.

Explanation:

In the excerpt, Paul expresses how even though he tried to avoid Mitchell, he did not succeed. He then comes up with the idea of going to his bigger sister, Cassie, ash he knows that she will side with him. Paul describes his sister as tough, smart and a bit cocky, so he is probably going up to her for advice on how to confront Mitchell.

the first proposition is to question economic materialism and victorian christianity. the lines are:

“it moves us not.—great god! i'd rather be

a pagan suckled in a creed outworn; ”

wordsworth is stating that nature no longer interests mankind, that the latter is not “moved” by it and explains that ancient western paganism had a more positive attitude concerning nature since it lacked the perv erted judaeo-christian interpretation of having received the world and all its animals and elements from god to use as we , instead of humans actually being not only part of nature but its wardens, meant to appreciate it and protect it.

the next lines are:

“so might i, standing on this pleasant lea,

have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

have sight of proteus coming from the sea;

or hear old triton blow his wreathed horn.”

wordsworth here make it very clear that by actually looking and contemplating nature, human beings would reconnect with happiness, serenity and purpose. the use of mythological figures is quite evocative as well, proteus is a greek mythological god of the changing sea. he personifies the sea that changes, which symbolizes the way nature changes and inevitably can change to be destructive not only due to natural causes but to human pollution. furthermore, the sea is even more symbolic since all life originated in the sea so it is not only our past but our future since no life form in our planet can survive without water and if all water is destroyed in earth all life will be gone as well.

he then uses triton which is symbolic of the synthesis of both nature and mankind. triton is a mythological greek god that has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a fish (a merman). this human fish duality evokes the fact that humans are not only human but also part of nature, the fish tail representing nature. the main attribute of this god was that he used a conch shell as a horn to calm the roaring seas. in other words, triton uses nature through science for the benefit of human sailors who risk death during tempests. with the use of such metaphor, wordworth is conveying the message that human technology   is supposed to use nature to preserve nature and thereby humanity as well.

answer: honestly, me too dude. i feel that.

explanation: