Which is not a question you should ask when evaluating a source for credibility? what do the images look like? what are the author’s credentials? does the author show any bias? what is the purpose of the source?

The correct answer is alternative one.

At the time of evaluating a source for credibility, it is important to find out the author's qualifications, achievements, personal quality or his or her background, in order to indicate if he or she is a suitable source of reliability.

Regarding bias, another source for author integrity has to do with unfair prejudices in favour or against something, a person or group.

Finally, it is essential to know the reasons for writing the source. As a result, all these reasons are fundamental when considering the credibility of a source.

well,

i dont learn that but this link might you out !

link -->

hope this : )

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .