subject
Engineering, 07.02.2022 14:00 johnplog2924

This chapter contains two views of the future. Since the validity of these views cannot be completely tested until the time period covered by the forecast has passed (so that predictions can be matched against actual events), how can we ever hope to establish in advance whether one is a better view than the other? What criteria might be proposed for evaluating predictions?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Engineering

question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
At 12 noon, the count in a bacteria culture was 400; at 4: 00 pm the count was 1200 let p(t) denote the bacteria cou population growth law. find: (a) an expression for the bacteria count at any time t (b) the bacteria count at 10 am. (c) the time required for the bacteria count to reach 1800.
Answers: 1
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
Burgers vector is generally parallel to the dislocation line. a)-true b)-false
Answers: 2
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
The higher the astm grain size number, the finer the gran is. a)-true b)-false
Answers: 2
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
Hydraulic fluid with a sg. of 0.78 is flowing through a 1.5 in. i.d. pipe at 58 gal/min. the fluid has an absolute viscosity of 11.8 x 105 lbf-sec/ft2. is the flow laminar, turbulent or within the critical range? give both a numerical reynolds number and a term answer.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
This chapter contains two views of the future. Since the validity of these views cannot be completel...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.10.2021 21:30
question
Social Studies, 06.10.2021 21:30
question
Biology, 06.10.2021 21:30