Do you think it is important for archaeological sites to be protected from development once they are discovered? What are the pros and cons of each side of this issue? Once discovered, should artifacts be left as they are, or removed and displayed for others to learn about? What are the pros and cons of each option? How can cultural or societal influences affect the progression of scientific discovery? Do those influences normally have a positive or negative effect on science's ability to advance?

 lessons and benefits can seem removed from everyday life. ... If they determine a site is significant, it is ... CRM exists because legislators and their con- ... romance of excavation and discovery of the past for ... Archaeology permits intensive study of a single culture over time, removing the myth

considering the question as per the attachment

here we can see that the radon nuclide has 222 as the atomic mass number and 86 as the atomic number.

when it undergoes nuclear fission it gives polonium which has atomic mass number as 218 and atomic number will be 84 along with a helium nucleus which has 4 atomic mass number and 2 as its atomic number.

222 = 218 + 4 (atomic mass number)

86 = ? + 2; therefore ? = 86-2 = 84.

the atomic mass number of polonium will be 84.

gasoline is a mixture. it contains several different kinds of compounds that can be present in a variety of ratios.