Business, 12.08.2020 08:01 lifeisgaming37

State-of-the-art digital imaging equipment purchased 2 years ago for $50,000 had an expected useful life of 5 years and a $5000 salvage value. After its installation the performance, it was upgraded for $20,000 1 year ago. Increased demand now requires another upgrade for an additional $26,000 so that it can be used for three more years. Its new annual operating cost will be $30,000 with a $13,000 salvage after the 3 years. Alternatively, it can be replaced with new equipment costing $64,000, an estimated AOC of $15,000, and an expected salvage of $24,000 after 3 years. If replaced now, the existing equipment can be traded for only $9,000. Use a MARR of 12% per year. Required:
a. Determine whether the company should retain or replace the de- fender now.
b. Based on the poor experience with the current equipment, assume the person doing this analysis decides the challenger may be kept for only 2 years, not 3, with the same AOC and salvage estimates for the 2 years. What is the decision?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 17:50

When selecting stock, some financial experts recommend to look at the opening price go with what you know examine the day’s range, earnings per share, and p/e ratio divide the dividend by the asking price

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 21:40

The board of directors is the highest ranking body in a corporation, and the chairman of the board is the highest ranking individual. the ceo generally works under the board and its chairman, and the board generally has the authority to remove the ceo under certain conditions. the ceo, however, cannot remove the board, but he or she can endeavor to have the board voted out and a new board voted in should a conflict arise. it is possible for a person to simultaneously serve as ceo and chairman of the board, though many corporate control experts believe it is bad to vest both offices in the same person. true false

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 09:30

The 39 percent and 38 percent tax rates both represent what is called a tax "bubble." suppose the government wanted to lower the upper threshold of the 39 percent marginal tax bracket from $335,000 to $208,000. what would the new 39 percent bubble rate have to be? (do not round intermediate calculations. enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places,e.g., 32.16.)

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 14:30

In our daily interactions we can find ourselves listening to other people solely for the purpose of finding weakness in their positions so that we can formulate a convincing response. select one: true false

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

State-of-the-art digital imaging equipment purchased 2 years ago for $50,000 had an expected useful...

Questions