Anheuser-Busch, InBev NV, the maker of Bud Light, proposed a merger with Modelo, the maker of Corona. At the time of the proposed merger, AB InBev NV held 39% of the beer market, Miller/Coors held 26%, Modelo held 7%, and Heineken, the last of the big four held 6%. Other beer makers combined hold the remaining 22% of the U. S. beer market. The combination would give AB InBev NV 46% of the market. Modelo has been one of the market players that has resisted the parallel price increases in the industry.
Which of the following is correct?
a. The merger is simply an asset acquisition.
b. The merger is exempt under the failing company doctrine.
c. The merger proposed is a horizontal one.
d. The merger proposed is a vertical one.

Which of the following is not a consideration when determining your asset allocation

The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u.s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.

The rybczynski theorem describes: (a) how commodity price changes influence real factor rewards (b) how commodity price changes influence relative factor rewards. (c) how changes in factor endowments cause changes in commodity outputs. (d) how trade leads to factor price equalization.